EdSight

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
eugenio_maria_de_hostos_y_de_bonilla

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

eugenio_maria_de_hostos_y_de_bonilla [2026/04/15 08:26] – created duchaeugenio_maria_de_hostos_y_de_bonilla [2026/04/20 03:01] (current) – ducha
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 **4. Systematization:** the fullest stage, in which the individual formulates ideas, generalizes, produces personal philosophies and ideologies, and brings order to unfamiliar phenomena. **4. Systematization:** the fullest stage, in which the individual formulates ideas, generalizes, produces personal philosophies and ideologies, and brings order to unfamiliar phenomena.
- 
-  * de Hostos, E. M. (1939d). //Ensayos didácticos// (Vol. XVIII). Cultural, S.A. 
-  * de Hostos, E. M. (1991). //Ciencia de la Pedagogía// (Vol. VI). Editorial del Instituto de Cultura Puertorriqueña. 
-  * Sisler, R. F. (1962). //Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla: A comparative study of the educational and political contributions of this Antillean philosopher and reformer// [Doctoral dissertation, New York University]. 
-  * Laboy, R. G. (2011). The Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla educational philosophy. //Revista Brasileira de Educação//, 16, 51–67. 
-  * Rojas Osorio, C. (2012). Eugenio María de Hostos and his pedagogical thought. //Curriculum Inquiry//, 42(1), 12–32. 
  
 ==== de Hostos and Morality: the //Moral Social// ==== ==== de Hostos and Morality: the //Moral Social// ====
Line 41: Line 35:
 **6. The family of nations:** the transnational order through which peoples enact mutual responsibility. **6. The family of nations:** the transnational order through which peoples enact mutual responsibility.
  
-  * de Hostos, E. M. (1964). //Moral social//. Las Américas Publishing. 
-  * de Hostos, E. M. (1989). //Tratado de la Sociología// (Vol. VIII). Editorial del Instituto de Cultura Puertorriqueña. 
-  * de Hostos, E. M. (2000). //Tratado de Moral//. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. 
-  * González, J. E. (1991). La "Moral Social" de Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla en su centenario. //Díalogos//, 26(57), 7–33. 
-  * Parrish, R. T. (1940). A study of the personality and thought of Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin]. 
  
 ==== The Normal School and Education for Liberation ==== ==== The Normal School and Education for Liberation ====
Line 51: Line 40:
 de Hostos' most significant institutional contribution was the founding and funding of the first Normal School in Santo Domingo — the first free school of its kind in the Dominican Republic and the first dedicated to training teachers. Designed to "teach reason by utilizing the law of logic," the Normal School replaced the mnemonic pedagogy customary in Spanish colonial education with reasoning and active dialogue, and anchored de Hostos' conviction that education was the principal variable in an individual's development, growth, evolution, and change toward morality and liberation. de Hostos led the Dominican Department of Public Instruction, taught at a professional institute, and shaped educational reforms of the 1880s and 1890s that modernized Dominican schooling and introduced a holistic curriculum — drawing, manual training, music, moral and civic education, and gymnastics — that persists today in much of the world's liberal primary and secondary curriculum. His political philosophy, "deHostosianismo," fused a moral-social imperative with economic development and political modernity, and his motto "Civilización o Muerte" articulated education as a universal imperative to teach everyone to think. de Hostos' most significant institutional contribution was the founding and funding of the first Normal School in Santo Domingo — the first free school of its kind in the Dominican Republic and the first dedicated to training teachers. Designed to "teach reason by utilizing the law of logic," the Normal School replaced the mnemonic pedagogy customary in Spanish colonial education with reasoning and active dialogue, and anchored de Hostos' conviction that education was the principal variable in an individual's development, growth, evolution, and change toward morality and liberation. de Hostos led the Dominican Department of Public Instruction, taught at a professional institute, and shaped educational reforms of the 1880s and 1890s that modernized Dominican schooling and introduced a holistic curriculum — drawing, manual training, music, moral and civic education, and gymnastics — that persists today in much of the world's liberal primary and secondary curriculum. His political philosophy, "deHostosianismo," fused a moral-social imperative with economic development and political modernity, and his motto "Civilización o Muerte" articulated education as a universal imperative to teach everyone to think.
  
-  * de Hostos, E. M. (1954). //de Hostos: Peregrino del ideal//. Sociedad de Literarias y Artísticas. 
-  * de Hostos, E. M. (1989). //Tratado de la Sociología// (Vol. VIII). Editorial del Instituto de Cultura Puertorriqueña. 
-  * Rodriguez, F. (2019). //Mapping contested identities in Dominican art education: An historical inquiry//. The Pennsylvania State University. 
-  * Mayes, A. J. (2008). Why Dominican feminism moved to the right: Class, colour and women's activism in the Dominican Republic, 1880s–1940s. //Gender & History//, 20(2), 349–371. 
-  * Eugenio María de Hostos Community College. (n.d.). About the man, Eugenio María de Hostos. 
  
 ==== Scientific Education for Women ==== ==== Scientific Education for Women ====
  
 Writing in Chile and throughout his Latíno American travels, de Hostos argued that the liberation of peoples was impossible without the education of women. His articles "Scientific Training for Women" emphasized women's access to scientific reasoning as the foundation of critical discourse and free societies; in //La educación científica de la mujer// (1993) he held that men and women possessed equal human abilities and rejected the domestic confinement imposed on women as dehumanizing and incompatible with liberty. A scientific education, he argued, would allow women to become "owners of their destiny." While nineteenth-century advances were limited, de Hostos' stance prefigured twentieth- and twenty-first-century feminist educational scholarship and continues to animate ongoing work on persistent gender gaps in Latíno American education. Writing in Chile and throughout his Latíno American travels, de Hostos argued that the liberation of peoples was impossible without the education of women. His articles "Scientific Training for Women" emphasized women's access to scientific reasoning as the foundation of critical discourse and free societies; in //La educación científica de la mujer// (1993) he held that men and women possessed equal human abilities and rejected the domestic confinement imposed on women as dehumanizing and incompatible with liberty. A scientific education, he argued, would allow women to become "owners of their destiny." While nineteenth-century advances were limited, de Hostos' stance prefigured twentieth- and twenty-first-century feminist educational scholarship and continues to animate ongoing work on persistent gender gaps in Latíno American education.
- 
-  * de Hostos, E. M. (1993). //La educación científica de la mujer//. Universidad de Puerto Rico. 
-  * Guerra, L. (1995). Feminismo e ideología liberal en el pensamiento de Hostos. In J. C. López (Ed.), //de Hostos: Sentido y proyección de su obra en América// (pp. 361–374). Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. 
-  * Roberts, E. (2012). The educational gender gap in Latin America: Why some girls do not attend school. //Clocks and Clouds//, 2(1). 
-  * Rojas Osorio, C. (2012). Eugenio María de Hostos and his pedagogical thought. //Curriculum Inquiry//, 42(1), 12–32. 
  
 ==== Legacy and Influence on Liberatory Pedagogy ==== ==== Legacy and Influence on Liberatory Pedagogy ====
Line 70: Line 49:
 de Hostos' ideologies of reasoning, liberation, and moral-social responsibility shaped twentieth- and twenty-first-century educational theorists across Latíno Ameríca, the Caribbean, and beyond. Rojas Osorio (2012) holds that de Hostos "prefigured Freire" in treating education as a civic responsibility not only for oneself but for society; his critique of memorization and authoritative pedagogy resonates with Freire's //Pedagogy of the Oppressed//, his developmental frames are echoed implicitly in Montessori's respect for the curious child, and his fight for liberation threads through post-independence educators including Andrés Bello, Manuel Belgrano, José Martí, and Simón Rodríguez. Contemporary scholars read de Hostos' work as foundational to critical thinking, critical race theory, critical racial literacy, and conceptions of social and cultural capital; his insistence on the moral-social fabric of society continues to animate educational-justice research on school funding, English-learner policy, the school-to-prison nexus, the abolition of the death penalty, and resistance to curricular censorship. Yet his central unfinished project — the independence of Puerto Rico — remains; more than a century after his death, his body still lies in the Dominican national mausoleum awaiting the liberation of his birthplace. de Hostos' ideologies of reasoning, liberation, and moral-social responsibility shaped twentieth- and twenty-first-century educational theorists across Latíno Ameríca, the Caribbean, and beyond. Rojas Osorio (2012) holds that de Hostos "prefigured Freire" in treating education as a civic responsibility not only for oneself but for society; his critique of memorization and authoritative pedagogy resonates with Freire's //Pedagogy of the Oppressed//, his developmental frames are echoed implicitly in Montessori's respect for the curious child, and his fight for liberation threads through post-independence educators including Andrés Bello, Manuel Belgrano, José Martí, and Simón Rodríguez. Contemporary scholars read de Hostos' work as foundational to critical thinking, critical race theory, critical racial literacy, and conceptions of social and cultural capital; his insistence on the moral-social fabric of society continues to animate educational-justice research on school funding, English-learner policy, the school-to-prison nexus, the abolition of the death penalty, and resistance to curricular censorship. Yet his central unfinished project — the independence of Puerto Rico — remains; more than a century after his death, his body still lies in the Dominican national mausoleum awaiting the liberation of his birthplace.
  
-  * González, J. E. (1989). //Vivir a de Hostos//. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. 
-  * Freire, P. (2018). //Pedagogy of the oppressed//. Bloomsbury. 
-  * Villarini, Á. R. (2010). //El pensamiento vivo de Eugenio María de Hostos en torno a la educación ética, cívica e intelectual//. Biblioteca del Pensamiento Crítico. 
-  * Martínez, D. G., & Spikes, D. D. (2020). Se acabaron las palabras: A post-mortem //Flores v. Arizona// disproportional funding analysis of targeted English Learner (EL) expenditures. //Educational Policy//. 
-  * Caban, P. (2021). Puerto Rico in crisis and the shifting dictates of Empire. //Centro Journal//, 33(1), 7–40. 
  
 ==== de Hostos' Works ==== ==== de Hostos' Works ====
Line 90: Line 64:
   * de Hostos, E. M. (1993). //La educación científica de la mujer//. Universidad de Puerto Rico.   * de Hostos, E. M. (1993). //La educación científica de la mujer//. Universidad de Puerto Rico.
   * de Hostos, E. M. (2000). //Tratado de Moral//. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico.   * de Hostos, E. M. (2000). //Tratado de Moral//. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico.
-  * Bachiller, A. R. (1999). Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla, filósofo puertorriqueño. //Revista de Hispanismo Filosófico//, 4, 11–27. +  
-  * Caban, P. (2021). Puerto Rico in crisis and the shifting dictates of Empire. //Centro Journal//, 33(1), 7–40. +
-  * Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., & York, R. L. (1966). //Equality of educational opportunity study//. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. +
-  * Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (1995). //Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement//. The New Press. +
-  * Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. //Science//, 31(787), 121–127. +
-  * Díaz, H. L., & Díaz, H. G. (2021). The myth of the monolithic LatinX population. //Teachers College Record//. +
-  * Freire, P. (2018). //Pedagogy of the oppressed//. Bloomsbury. +
-  * Gallagher, K. (2010). Why I will not teach to the test. //Education Week//, 30(12), 36–29. +
-  * González, J. E. (1989). //Vivir a de Hostos//. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. +
-  * González, J. E. (1991). La "Moral Social" de Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla en su centenario. //Díalogos//, 26(57), 7–33. +
-  * Guerra, L. (1995). Feminismo e ideología liberal en el pensamiento de Hostos. In J. C. López (Ed.), //de Hostos: Sentido y proyección de su obra en América// (pp. 361–374). Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. +
-  * Haywood, J. M. (2017). "Latino spaces have always been the most violent": Afro-Latino collegians' perceptions of colorism and Latino intragroup marginalization. //International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education//, 30(8), 759–782. +
-  * Henriquez-Ureña, C. (1928). Las ideas educativas de Hostos. In //Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla: A comparative study of the educational and political contributions of this Antillean philosopher and reformer// (cited in Sisler, 1962). +
-  * Huxel, A. C. (2013). Authentic Montessori: The teacher makes the difference. //Montessori Life//, 25(2), 32. +
-  * Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to the test...or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage greater conceptual understanding. //Educational Psychology Review//, 26(2), 307–329. +
-  * Laboy, R. G. (2011). The Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla educational philosophy. //Revista Brasileira de Educação//, 16, 51–67. +
-  * Lee, M. (1940). Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla: After one hundred years. //Books Abroad//, 14(2), 124–128. +
-  * Martínez, D. G., & Spikes, D. D. (2020). Se acabaron las palabras: A post-mortem //Flores v. Arizona// disproportional funding analysis of targeted English Learner (EL) expenditures. //Educational Policy//. +
-  * Mayes, A. J. (2008). Why Dominican feminism moved to the right. //Gender & History//, 20(2), 349–371. +
-  * Morodo, R. (1986). de Hostos en el transfondo jurídico-político del 68 español. //Revista Jurídica UPR//, 55, 185. +
-  * Pan American Union. (1939). The centenary of Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla. //Bulletin of the Pan American Union//, 73(1), 85. +
-  * Parrish, R. T. (1940). //A study of the personality and thought of Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla// [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin]. +
-  * Pedreira, A. S. (1964). //de Hostos: Ciudadano de América//. Instituto de Cultura Puertorriqueña. +
-  * Rivera, S. V. M. (1991). //The democratic character of the educational, social, and political thought of Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla//. Harvard University. +
-  * Rivera, Á. A. (2020). The Spanish Caribbean Confederation: Modern subjectivities and a rhetoric of failure. //Small Axe//, 24(1), 53–60. +
-  * Roberts, E. (2012). The educational gender gap in Latin America. //Clocks and Clouds//, 2(1). +
-  * Rodriguez, F. (2019). //Mapping contested identities in Dominican art education//. The Pennsylvania State University. +
-  * Rojas Osorio, C. (2001). //Foucault y el posmodernismo//. Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica. +
-  * Rojas Osorio, C. (2010). //Filosofía de la educación: De los griegos a la tardomodernidad//. Editorial de la Universidad de Antioquia. +
-  * Rojas Osorio, C. (2012). Eugenio María de Hostos and his pedagogical thought. //Curriculum Inquiry//, 42(1), 12–32. +
-  * Rowe, L. S. (1939). de Hostos in the Pan American Union. //Bulletin of the Pan American Union//, 73, 83. +
-  * Sealey-Ruiz, Y. (2021). //Racial literacy: A policy research brief//. National Council of Teachers of English. +
-  * Sisler, R. F. (1962). //Eugenio María de Hostos y de Bonilla: A comparative study of the educational and political contributions of this Antillean philosopher and reformer// [Doctoral dissertation, New York University]. +
-  * Solis, L. H. R. (2009). Educación y construcción de identidad. //Educere//, 13(47), 1053–1061. +
-  * Tirri, K., & Toom, A. (2020). The moral role of pedagogy as the science and art of teaching. In //Pedagogy in basic and higher education: Current developments and challenges// (pp. 3–13). +
-  * Villarini, Á. R. (2010). //El pensamiento vivo de Eugenio María de Hostos en torno a la educación ética, cívica e intelectual//. Biblioteca del Pensamiento Crítico. +
-  * Welsh, M. E., Eastwood, M., & D'Agostino, J. V. (2014). Conceptualizing teaching to the test under standards-based reform. //Applied Measurement in Education//, 27(2), 98–114. +
-  * Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. //Race Ethnicity and Education//, 8(1), 69–91. +
-  * Zohar, A., & Alboher Agmon, V. (2018). Raising test scores vs. teaching higher order thinking (HOT). //Research in Science & Technological Education//, 36(2), 243–260.+
eugenio_maria_de_hostos_y_de_bonilla.txt · Last modified: by ducha